SorrybutAVG

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

"There are at least two atheists in the world" is now considered an "in-your-face offensive" statement

Posted on 11:57 AM by Unknown
The Arizona Coalition of Reason has put up what ought to be the least controversial of the various atheist billboards, because all it says is, "Don't believe in God? You are not alone." In other words, it is asserting that at least two atheists in the world exist.

Somehow, asserting this fact in public is construed by some bigoted fuckheads as being somehow "offensive":

Phoenix resident Irving Faulkner says his first thought when he saw the billboard is that it’s in your face offensive.

Ophelia Ortiz had a similar reaction.

“I think it’s wrong, because why not believe in God? Everybody has their own beliefs,” said Ortiz.

ARGH! Ms. Ortiz, the billboard does not fucking say that you shouldn't believe in God. In fact, it says exactly what you said, that "everybody has their own beliefs," but those nasty atheists had the audacity to also go and suggest that maybe their beliefs... exist? What??

The other two common atheist advertisements read, "You can be good without God," and the original UK one, "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life." I can actually understand why someone might find the latter offensive.

First of all, it makes a direct theological assertion: "There's probably no God." In a perfect world, I'd actually rather prefer that billboards and bus advertisements didn't make assertions such as these, because, well, all other things being equal, talking about religion is kindof retarded. That includes discussing or promoting atheism -- in a perfect world. If theists would just STFU and stop trying to push their delusions on other people or influence the political process to conform to
If you find this offensive, okay, I guess I can understand that.
their arbitary dogmas, and if theistic beliefs that condoned violence and torture and hatred in the name of God were rare or nonexistent, in that alternate reality, this entire blog would seem rather silly, wouldn't it? Dawkins' The God Delusion would be nothing but a lot of hot air, rather akin to writing an entire book about why you didn't care for the taste of olives. But that's not the world we live in, is it?

The problem is that similar religious messages -- which I do believe are offensive -- are tolerated all the time. As long as it's okay to put up a billboard that says "Jesus saves!", then it ought to be just as okay to put up a billboard that says "Jesus doesn't save!" On a side note, those cities who have declined atheist bus ads because they don't allow religious advertising of any type, I'm down with that. As long as you can't shove Jesus down my throat, I don't need to shove my atheism down yours.

If you find this offensive, then you are a bigot.
Secondly, the original billboard implicitly suggests that one major result of a belief in God is to make people worry and prevent them from enjoying life. I think this is true for a lot of people, and I am totally on board with the billboard because IMO the target audience is people who are already pretty sure there is no God but still worry about it. But I can understand a happy care-free theist (and yes, they do exist, obviously) being a bit resentful of that implication.

Now, the "You can be good without God" ad makes no such generalizations, and if you have a problem with it, then you are automatically a bigot, because you are saying all
But if you find this offensive, then you are completely insane!
nontheists are bad. However, it does actually make a statement that some people (i.e. bigots) might disagree with. So while it ought not to be controversial, I am not terribly surprised that it is.

But the "You are not alone" billboards? What? So what is the problem here? Is it that these people think there really are only zero or one atheists in the entire world? (I guess that one guy has been putting up a lot of billboards) Or is it that even just mentioning the existence of atheism is taboo? I admit, I am a little surprised people could call the billboards "offensive" with a straight face. Sure, I could imagine stupid assholes saying things like, "That kind of message is not what we need in our community" and "It makes me sad that some people reject Jesus." But to say that the billboard itself is offensive? WTF?!?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in atheism, bus ads | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • If feminism killed chivalry, then chivalry kills common courtesy
    An argument that those who pine for the days of unrepentant misogyny are fond of repeating is the idea that gender equality has eroded tradi...
  • Gender politics and Automoblox
    Update: Jason Thibeault, who has a much larger readership than I, helped me publicize this issue (thanks Jason!)... and the co-founder sho...
  • Free will and hot peppers
    Daniel Dennett and Jerry Coyne are hanging around the former's apartment. Dennett goes to the kitchen, pulls a jalapeno from the coldes...
  • Why Cee Lo's word change to Imagine is really crappy
    I was not the only one to notice that Cee Lo Green, when performing John Lennon's Imagine just before the ball drop last night, change...
  • If you are liberal or atheist and you oppose the Park51 community center, you have been bamboozled
    It's infuriating, but probably not too surprising, how many conservatives don't understand the First Amendment. Regardless of how y...
  • Why I oppose the figurative use of the term "militant" in all contexts
    Uh oh, I go and call Bruce Hood a "nice guy" , and Bruce himself responds in the comments unfortunately triggering one of my big ...
  • Why is oxygen the third most common element in the universe?
    So it appears from several sources that the three most common elements in the universe are, in order, hydrogen, helium, and oxygen. The firs...
  • The evolutionary implications of our preference for the Maillard reaction
    This is something that has been bugging me the last couple of days... As many of the foodies out there may know, the Maillard reaction (pr...
  • Sorry, but AVG Secure Search is malware (Update: but maybe won't be in the next version)
    Discovered AVG Secure Search today when I installed the trial version of WinZip on a laptop that I only intend to use temporarily. There se...
  • Why the experience of anti-atheist prejudice is different, though similar, to prejudice regarding sexual orientation, race, gender, etc.
    At a post over at Prop8TrialTracker.com on the purging of the most vile homophobic elements from the mainstream anti-marriage equality move...

Categories

  • abortion
  • accomodationism
  • alternative medicine
  • apatheism
  • atheism
  • birther hilarity
  • bus ads
  • censorship
  • christian apologetics
  • christianity
  • civility
  • colbert
  • cooking
  • creationism
  • death
  • drinking
  • dualism
  • environment
  • evolution
  • facial hair
  • faith
  • feminism
  • file sharing
  • health care
  • hinduism
  • history
  • home improvement
  • intelligent design
  • islam
  • judaism
  • lgbt
  • local farming
  • lolcatz
  • math
  • misogyny
  • morality
  • mormonism
  • music
  • occupy
  • parenthood
  • peer review
  • philosophy
  • physics
  • politics
  • programming
  • racism
  • sikhism
  • skepticism
  • sustainable farming
  • trolls
  • vaccines
  • vegetarianism
  • video games
  • war on christmas

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2012 (55)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (72)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2010 (106)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ▼  2009 (171)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ▼  August (38)
      • The evolutionary implications of our preference fo...
      • Bad-ass chicken-killing mofo
      • Tattoo ideas?
      • ABBA: Atheist music???
      • Why people like Greg Laden piss me off
      • And what should that tell you?
      • Calling all Maine residents
      • Biology and Morality, Or How I Learned to Stop Wor...
      • The Stupidity of Attempted Secrecy
      • You just have to listen for yourself...
      • I fall hard for satire site
      • An uninteresting post that fulfills the original p...
      • We should pity Angela Shiel
      • Legislative Prayer: It's all Greek to me
      • Robots evolve to deceive -- how could they evolve ...
      • Anakin Skywalker is to Orly Taitz as Metachlorians...
      • Michael Ruse of beliefnet builds a giant strawman
      • LOLGODZ
      • The Curse of Ken Ham Part Two: The Bride of Mortenson
      • Breaking News: Terrorists Win
      • Faith: One word, two meanings
      • "You've already lost"
      • The Curse of Ken Ham
      • Conservapedia on Moonenbaumgate
      • Maybe the accomodationists are the ones who need t...
      • Possible reason why people were so offended by the...
      • Ken Ham: Plagiarist?
      • How to turn "Greeks" into "Jews"?!?
      • My Deconversion
      • We must prevent Gog and Magog from acquiring weapo...
      • Sshhh, don't tell anybody...
      • "There are at least two atheists in the world" is ...
      • The disastrous ethical consequences of the Atoneme...
      • "I think the interview went well..."
      • Baby's first real food
      • ORLY?
      • "Toxins" and the Fallacy of Limited Depth
      • Ten New Ways to Piss Off God
    • ►  July (52)
    • ►  June (21)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile